Below The Heavens Re-issue

FINALLY

LOL

Gotta get it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I suppose this means my originally isn't worth much anymore. Ahh shucks.

"this album is incredibly sought after in collectors circles ($200 + online for original copies)!"

And here I thought I did pretty good selling both my copies for $40 & 50 a piece...

lol.. the last one on ebay went for ike 150 I think

I sold both my copies around two years ago, I could probably have made a killin' if I held on to them a little longer. Plus, I sold them on Amazon, nobody is really competing each other to get the winning bid.

Is underground hip hop a reliable seller?

I've never had a problem with their service.

UGHH is definitely reliable. A little overpriced at times though.

haha yep, say good bye to the value of your original folkz. You will now get as much as Tran got, if you're lucky

It depends on how limited the rerelease is and how many are aware of it.

TheHazardous wrote:

It depends on how limited the rerelease is and how many are aware of it.

True but I would guess you aren't gonna see any sell too high if word gets around... They already have on amazon for 15.97. Those into making money grab these shits before it's well known that the re release is out and slang em on ebay to the unsuspecting population.. that may already be happening.

Hustle hard or go home.

Took 'em long enough. My OG is wore the fuck out. lol

Ordering now...

I got mine today. It's a nice repress IMO, but i'm not sure how it differs from the OG. The cd is a quality pro-press which was my major concern. The inserts are nice, but the front insert is just front and back. It's not a big deal to me, but I thought i remember someone saying the OG was a booklet. Also, the spine on the jewel case doesn't list the artist or album. Is that like the OG?

I had no booklet... maybe 2 pages? Label definitely on the spine, though.

Nah, the OG had only a front insert, front and back. I don't remember anything about the spine on the jewel case, though.

Label definitely on the spine, though, indeed. Haven't opened my OG, so I can't say about the inserts

I have the OG and it did not have a booklet...

Alan wrote:

I suppose this means my originally isn't worth much anymore. Ahh shucks.

Yeah, it was a pain in the balls to get my copy too. smh

You're not dead????

Zaza Pachulia wrote:

You're not dead????

Well I was. But I'm better now.

Your Mets are beasting it up...4th place in the division looks good on em.

lol. Well, that's what happens when your starting CF,3B,1B, and Ace are out for significant amounts of time. I'm confident the fully healthy bunch can contend for the WC. But, who knows who will still be on the team after the trade deadline.

Also....Jason K Bay blows. -_-

EDIT: How bout Reyes? Dude is killin it.

Jason Bay may blow, but he ain't Uggla...

Reyes is killing it, but knowing him he's one hamstring away from the DL.

Myth: Jose Reyes is injury-prone.

Fact: Outside of 2009, in which his leg injury was grossly mismanaged, Reyes has averaged just over 153 games per season since 2005. In 2010 his oblique injury was also mismanaged, even so he still played in 133 games.

So, basically this idea that Reyes is always injured, is injury-prone, is one bunt-single away from an injury, etc. is complete bullshit.

Mismanage or not, the fact is he has missed 265 games the last 3 years. That's a lot of missed games.

See, now that's just not true at all. You say last three years, so I assume you mean 2008-2010. Those include both of his recent "injury" years. He played 328 of 486 games. That's him only missing 158 games over the last three years. See the image below. You'll notice that between 2005 and 2008, he played basically every game.




EDIT: I see what you did there. Can't include 2011 if it isn't even over yet, lol.

lmao... tran with his wack math trying to pull one over... but Rukus just sonned him...

FATALITY!!!

RuKuS wrote:

See, now that's just not true at all. You say last three years, so I assume you mean 2008-2010. Those include both of his recent "injury" years. He played 328 of 486 games. That's him only missing 158 games over the last three years. See the image below. You'll notice that between 2005 and 2008, he played basically every game.




EDIT: I see what you did there. Can't include 2011 if it isn't even over yet, lol.

lol ya, I looked at it wrong, my bad. Utter fail on my part. When I saw 53 games in 2011, I automatically assumed it was 2010. You are right, but Reyes still sucks in my Braves opinion...haha.