Best Album 1994 Round 1: Super Tight vs. Tical (B)

vs.

What's that shit that they be smokin'? Tical... Tical, Tical

Super Tight fairly easily.

Super Tight...

I came to bring the pain, hardcore to the brain...

Going with Super Tight, just has more replay value for me. Starting to like it more than Ridin' Dirty actually.

Tical wins for me. Super Tight may be objectively better but I spin Tical more.

Supertight

How can one album be objectively better than another? I'm seriously asking this question and I would like some answers.

going with Tical barely

Half wrote:

How can one album be objectively better than another? I'm seriously asking this question and I would like some answers.

I'm just going on consensus opinions. Most say Super Tight has no skip tracks (personally I disagree) hence it's considered a 5 star album, whereas most feel that Tical is in the 4-4.5 star range.

I rate both these albums at 4.5 stars, but I give Tical the edge because I spin it more. I'm good either way though.

KJ Styles wrote:

Half wrote:

How can one album be objectively better than another? I'm seriously asking this question and I would like some answers.

I'm just going on consensus opinions. Most say Super Tight has no skip tracks (personally I disagree) hence it's considered a 5 star album, whereas most feel that Tical is in the 4-4.5 star range.

I rate both these albums at 4.5 stars, but I give Tical the edge because I spin it more. I'm good either way though.

A couple of things:

A consensus opinion is an opinion is it not? That removes objectivity from the equation right there.

Here's the beginning of wiki's article on objectivity:

"Objectivity is both a central and elusive philosophical category. While there is no universally accepted articulation of objectivity, a proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are met and are "mind-independent"—that is, not met by the judgment of a conscious entity or subject."

With that out of the way... where do you get your data? When you say "most" what do you mean?

Half wrote:

KJ Styles wrote:

Half wrote:

How can one album be objectively better than another? I'm seriously asking this question and I would like some answers.

I'm just going on consensus opinions. Most say Super Tight has no skip tracks (personally I disagree) hence it's considered a 5 star album, whereas most feel that Tical is in the 4-4.5 star range.

I rate both these albums at 4.5 stars, but I give Tical the edge because I spin it more. I'm good either way though.

A couple of things:

A consensus opinion is an opinion is it not? That removes objectivity from the equation right there.

Here's the beginning of wiki's article on objectivity:

"Objectivity is both a central and elusive philosophical category. While there is no universally accepted articulation of objectivity, a proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are met and are "mind-independent"—that is, not met by the judgment of a conscious entity or subject."

With that out of the way... where do you get your data? When you say "most" what do you mean?

You're overanalyzing this shit far too much.

KJ Styles wrote:

Half wrote:

KJ Styles wrote:

Half wrote:

How can one album be objectively better than another? I'm seriously asking this question and I would like some answers.

I'm just going on consensus opinions. Most say Super Tight has no skip tracks (personally I disagree) hence it's considered a 5 star album, whereas most feel that Tical is in the 4-4.5 star range.

I rate both these albums at 4.5 stars, but I give Tical the edge because I spin it more. I'm good either way though.

A couple of things:

A consensus opinion is an opinion is it not? That removes objectivity from the equation right there.

Here's the beginning of wiki's article on objectivity:

"Objectivity is both a central and elusive philosophical category. While there is no universally accepted articulation of objectivity, a proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are met and are "mind-independent"—that is, not met by the judgment of a conscious entity or subject."

With that out of the way... where do you get your data? When you say "most" what do you mean?

You're overanalyzing this shit far too much.

Post of the year.

Half wrote:

KJ Styles wrote:

Half wrote:

KJ Styles wrote:

Half wrote:

How can one album be objectively better than another? I'm seriously asking this question and I would like some answers.

I'm just going on consensus opinions. Most say Super Tight has no skip tracks (personally I disagree) hence it's considered a 5 star album, whereas most feel that Tical is in the 4-4.5 star range.

I rate both these albums at 4.5 stars, but I give Tical the edge because I spin it more. I'm good either way though.

A couple of things:

A consensus opinion is an opinion is it not? That removes objectivity from the equation right there.

Here's the beginning of wiki's article on objectivity:

"Objectivity is both a central and elusive philosophical category. While there is no universally accepted articulation of objectivity, a proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are met and are "mind-independent"—that is, not met by the judgment of a conscious entity or subject."

With that out of the way... where do you get your data? When you say "most" what do you mean?

You're overanalyzing this shit far too much.

Post of the year.

Congratulations, hipster!

...Never been a fan of Meth solo albums....Tical has the best Meth solo songs on it but as an album it's not seeing Super Tight

Super Tight

Super Tight easily, I never liked Tical as much as everyone else I knew.

Tical no question. I like Super Tight but its UGK's 3rd best...i like Ridin Dirty exponentially better

"It all started wit a Pimp C, BITCH"

Meth

Tical

And, Half, do you actually expect KJ to have any respect for the meanings of the words he uses? I also like the way he answered your completely legitimate question... with name-calling.

Slang, even UGK's 3rd best album is better than a Method Man solo album.....lol

parker lewis wrote:

Tical

And, Half, do you actually expect KJ to have any respect for the meanings of the words he uses? I also like the way he answered your completely legitimate question... with name-calling.

Well, one can hope. I don't think KJ is a dumb guy. As for the name-calling, it didn't bother me, or surprise me for that matter. I think people that take a similar position would also end up shoving the topic under the rug or changing the subject out of insecurity. This isn't the only place I've seen that stance on objectivity, online or off, and I have yet to see a serious discussion about it. I'd really like to, maybe my understanding of objectivity is flawed. But I guess for now I'll stick to "over-analyzing this shit" in my head.

UGK all the way.

Alan wrote:

UGK all the way.

Yessir!