| Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... | |
|
+3T. Myers J. Harris Laced With Slang 7 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 5:25 pm | |
| He had sex with a 15 year old girl... who by all accounts looked 15... so where does that put Stak for you?
I don't think I can vibe with the man's music anymore, not knowing he's a sexual offender. I mean I know the other side will say 15 is older - she would be fucking in high school, etc... but its still no excuse in my book... |
|
| |
Laced With Slang Barack O-Donna
Posts : 9848 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 36 Location : Detroit
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 6:09 pm | |
| i never heard his music really...is this true? | |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 6:28 pm | |
| Wow. WTF? When did this happen? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 6:30 pm | |
| Apparently pretty recently, he is on probation for it I believe. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 6:33 pm | |
| Yeah, didn't hear anything about this; not like anyone but peeps here talk about him, but we'll see. |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 6:41 pm | |
| "He had sex with a 15 year old girl... who by all accounts looked 15"
This dude must have been drunk out of his mind or on PCP. If he wasn't on anything, then that's even worse. A 15 year old girl? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 7:58 pm | |
| I'm not a Haystak fan, however R Kelly did the EXACT SAME crap and I dig his music (although I like his older stuff better than his new stuff). |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 8:07 pm | |
| r. kelly...innocent homie. |
|
| |
T. Myers One Of A Kind
Posts : 10879 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 42
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 8:24 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Norfeest What's NXET?
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 48 Location : DMV
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 10:09 pm | |
| Innocent or not, R. Kelly sucks. I dug that one album with Public Announcement, but even that was so-so. He has some classic singles, though.
As far as Stak...no love.
Both suck, in my humble opinion, and deserve to to be chopped up and fed to the swine... | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 10:32 pm | |
| I am not for this or am I even trying to defend this act but let's be real for a second. It's 2009 and have you seen these 14-18 yrs olds lately? I mean seriously I have no problem admitting that I have looked at some and said damn when I was that age they did not look like that body wise. These young girls are not the chestless/regular booty semi innocent girls we grew up with these young girs got tat's, tongue rings, belly rings, and know all types of things about sex and have been expose in ways we weren't in the older generation. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 10:35 pm | |
| Where do you guys keep hearing this crap, he's not on the sex offender website as Terry pointed out. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 10:41 pm | |
| This happened in 1995. Stak was 22 girl was 15. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Fri 15 May 2009, 10:44 pm | |
| Oh crap...see? That's a HUGE difference then. ANd I found it as SRP already knows. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 12:25 am | |
| Yeah, HUGE as in way worse back then. |
|
| |
Dang! Trotter Banned From Amazon
Posts : 2589 Join date : 2009-05-06 Location : Between a rock and hard place
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 2:03 am | |
| Thats pretty sad. Thing with sex offenders is that the older they get the younger the victim. Dude is already like 36 years old..his next victim maybe 12...then he'll go after an 8 year old. When will it ever stop? | |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 2:16 am | |
| He must have a problem. If he was lonely, he should have resulted to either a stripper chick or dating service. Being a pedophile gets you nowhere. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 10:09 am | |
| Trotter, he was 22. The girl was 15 (allegedly, I've found no proof of this), and NOW he's like 36.
Steve how was it way worse back then? |
|
| |
Norfeest What's NXET?
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 48 Location : DMV
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 10:14 am | |
| Allegedly? Dude was convicted in a court of law. Whether she was 15, 17, 12, or 16...there's nothing alleged about her being a minor...
I still say he's only good for one thing...pig food. | |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 12:44 pm | |
| "I still say he's only good for one thing...pig food."
LOL!! | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 12:49 pm | |
| |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 1:01 pm | |
| Is Kopasetick your new ID Norf? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 1:01 pm | |
| bitches didn't look like pornstars at age 12 back then |
|
| |
T. Myers One Of A Kind
Posts : 10879 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 42
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 1:11 pm | |
| - J. Harris wrote:
- Is Kopasetick your new ID Norf?
Was it "The artist formerly known as Norf" that gave it away? LOL! | |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 1:15 pm | |
| "Was it "The artist formerly known as Norf" that gave it away? LOL!"
LOL!!! I wasn't even paying attention to the signature. My bad!! LOL!! | |
|
| |
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 16 May 2009, 7:33 pm | |
| Does anyone else realize that statutory rape means having sex with a minor, with the minors consent? | |
|
| |
Dang! Trotter Banned From Amazon
Posts : 2589 Join date : 2009-05-06 Location : Between a rock and hard place
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sun 17 May 2009, 5:00 am | |
| Back in 95 a 15 YO girl looked like a 15 YO girl--not like today. Haystack knew what he was doing | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: no love Mon 18 May 2009, 1:14 pm | |
| - Kopasetick wrote:
- Innocent or not, R. Kelly sucks. I dug that one album with Public Announcement, but even that was so-so. He has some classic singles, though.
As far as Stak...no love.
Both suck, in my humble opinion, and deserve to to be chopped up and fed to the swine... I have to agree with norf regarding no love. R Kelly did make good music, but I just can't bring myself to listen to his music. I remember listening to some of his older stuff, and I couldn't help but think he was dry snitching on himself. Think about it...."12 play", "If I Could Turn Back The Hands of Time".... eeewwww. Then he came out with an album called Chocolate Factory after he was accused of peeing on a girl. C'mon now, "CHOCOLATE FACTORY"???! Tell me that doesn't sound like he's calling the "dookie chute" by another name.
I only heard a few songs by Haystack, so I can't say I am a big fan of him by any means. However the songs I did listen to were pretty dope. |
|
| |
J. Harris Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 795 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 43 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Mon 18 May 2009, 7:39 pm | |
| "C'mon now, "CHOCOLATE FACTORY"???! Tell me that doesn't sound like he's calling the "dookie chute" by another name."
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
|
| |
Brittany Woof
Posts : 2 Join date : 2021-05-08
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 08 May 2021, 7:54 am | |
| I'm not sure why I'm just now seeing this . This happened in the 90s ,so why are we throwing peoples buisness out there? These parents let their daughters dress grown ,so how exactly was he supposed to know her age? 16 is age of consent in most states , I was 15 my ex husband was 24 ,we got married when I was 16 i had our babygirl at 17 ,and what we are not about to do is compare rape by force on adult ,or child to consensual sex with a minor there is a hella huge difference. i suggest those of you who want to speak on matters that you have no clue about ,better do some research you can really ruin someone's entire life labeling them something they are not especially as serious ,as calling some one a rapist! | |
|
| |
Brittany Woof
Posts : 2 Join date : 2021-05-08
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... Sat 08 May 2021, 8:31 am | |
| - Guest wrote:
- He had sex with a 15 year old girl... who by all accounts looked 15... so where does that put Stak for you?
I don't think I can vibe with the man's music anymore, not knowing he's a sexual offender. I mean I know the other side will say 15 is older - she would be fucking in high school, etc... but its still no excuse in my book... How would he of known that she was 15? lil girls dress like theyre grown ,where was her parents when she was partying with grown men. This happened in the 90s ,so you obviously already been vibing with his music . I was 15 when I met my now ex husband that was 24 ,I was 16 when we married, and 17 when I had our lil girl ....16 is age of consent in most states .the girl was15 ,stak was 22. statutory rape is not the same as RAPE ,or MOLESTING people its. a insult to those who were actually raped ,touched,etc un willing by someone ,so before every one starts hating and judging they need to know all their facts cause labeling someone a rapist is serious ,and can ruin someone's life ....my daughters dad isn't a rapist, I knew what I was doing ,and I consented . I've also had to go to court every week for 3 years for 2 lil girls really, very close to me . I had to sit quietly while i heard what messed up things he did to them having to get up and run out the court room so I didn't attack him he was supposed to be a family member ,and the first time it happened to one of themcame to me then I found out the other one has been going through it since she was 2 she was 6 when it all came out ....Stak isn't that type of monster. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... | |
| |
|
| |
| Haystak is a Statutory Rapist... | |
|