| 100 Greastest List (update) | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:37 pm | |
| Either way, I was right. So I win | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:38 pm | |
| No Jason the math is your system does not work because a
17 top 50
1 top 100
0 neither
vote gives the edge to top 100
which is following your system to a T
and that is not the correct outcome in that situation. |
|
| |
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:39 pm | |
| How does 17 for 50, 1 for 100, and 0 for neither equal top 100? Only 1 person voted 100 AND neither. That's roughly 94% for top 50 | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:42 pm | |
| Of course that would make sense Shon.
But according to jason - his system means a vote for top 50 is a vote for top 100 and top 50
so in that scenario you would have 1 more vote for top 100 than top 50 according to his simple logical system. |
|
| |
Jason It Takes A Nation of 1000s?
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2009-05-06
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:43 pm | |
| - RoyceJustShootsNines wrote:
- No Jason the math is your system does not work because a
17 top 50
1 top 100
0 neither
vote gives the edge to top 100
which is following your system to a T
and that is not the correct outcome in that situation. You're not following my system, you're following a misunderstanding of my system. You think my system would give a point value of 17 for top 50 and 18 for top 100, right? But as I said, I didn't lay out a points system, it's a logical system, that requires less math. For a points system, you need to work it like Shon said, give a higher point value to top 50 votes. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:45 pm | |
| It is not a logical system Jason - your system was flawed until you added the points in it - it's not that hard to see and admit that - but if you want to remain stubborn do you. |
|
| |
Jason It Takes A Nation of 1000s?
Posts : 1039 Join date : 2009-05-06
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:46 pm | |
| You don't even understand what I was talking about, which is made clear by your example. My way would NOT say what you think it would. I think you're just confusing yourself, and making it way more complicated than it is. | |
|
| |
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:55 pm | |
| SRP, again, put it this way. Say 1 vote for top 50, and 1 vote for neither. Where would this artist go? Top 100, right? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 9:56 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 10:01 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Wed 06 May 2009, 10:05 pm | |
| We all have perfect smilies. Who'd a thunk it | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Thu 07 May 2009, 9:51 am | |
| - Steve wrote:
- I know a few of those dudes got like 8 votes top 50, 6 top 100, and 3 neither. So that means that they are top 100, not top 50. How did you count those up?
In this scenario, I'd say this should be top 100 like Steve said. Because those 3 "niether" votes should probably cancel out 3 of the "top 50" votes. Either way, their are more votes against it being top 50 than for it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Fri 08 May 2009, 10:02 am | |
| Ya'll are looking into this waaaaaay too deeply. Just let Kev do his fuckin thing. |
|
| |
Half Paragraphs Relentless
Posts : 6865 Join date : 2009-06-12 Age : 248 Location : A Clean, Well-Lighted Place
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Thu 27 Aug 2009, 11:05 am | |
| The best artist is John Brown, just ask C.Tran. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Thu 27 Aug 2009, 3:21 pm | |
| Is that you? He looks like a halfmanhalfmonkey. |
|
| |
Half Paragraphs Relentless
Posts : 6865 Join date : 2009-06-12 Age : 248 Location : A Clean, Well-Lighted Place
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Thu 27 Aug 2009, 3:22 pm | |
| - wrote:
- Is that you? He looks like a halfmanhalfmonkey.
Want to know what I look like? Look at my avatar. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) Thu 27 Aug 2009, 3:36 pm | |
| - AFutureWithoutAPast wrote:
- The best artist is John Brown, just ask C.Tran.
LMFAO!!!! Hallelujah Holla Back!!!! |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: 100 Greastest List (update) | |
| |
|
| |
| 100 Greastest List (update) | |
|