| Who's Better? Part 4 | |
|
+7Norfeest Alan ACRID" Shaun TheHazardous Esco T. Myers 11 posters |
Who Ya Got? | Havoc | | 41% | [ 7 ] | Muggs | | 59% | [ 10 ] |
| Total Votes : 17 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
T. Myers One Of A Kind
Posts : 10879 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 42
| Subject: Who's Better? Part 4 Sat 03 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sat 03 Apr 2010, 6:11 pm | |
| This one's close but I'll take Havoc. Both are in my Top 20 though. |
|
| |
Esco It Takes A Nation of 1000s?
Posts : 1989 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : South GA
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sat 03 Apr 2010, 6:16 pm | |
| Gotta go with Havoc. One of my favorite producers. His 90's beats were nothing but fire, and even today they're still dope | |
|
| |
TheHazardous Smells Like Roses...
Posts : 3500 Join date : 2009-05-28 Age : 43 Location : Bankhead SHAWTY and we'll take yo COOKIE!
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sat 03 Apr 2010, 8:25 pm | |
| Muggs has a more diverse soundscape overall. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sat 03 Apr 2010, 8:56 pm | |
| Havoc in his prime was probably better but muggs has been dope for 20 years so i'll go with him |
|
| |
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sat 03 Apr 2010, 11:59 pm | |
| Muggs is probably better, but I listen to way more ish with the Havoc stamp. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm | |
| Havoc is in my top 5, so he's my pick. |
|
| |
ACRID" It Takes A Nation of 1000s?
Posts : 1251 Join date : 2009-05-08 Age : 39 Location : DC by way of So.Cal.
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 4:09 pm | |
| Going with Muggs...The longetivity of his career-his footprints bigger in Hip-Hop | |
|
| |
Alan Smokes More Trees Than The Slash And Burn Technique
Posts : 5364 Join date : 2009-06-11 Age : 43 Location : Minneapolis, MN
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm | |
| I dig Muggs a bit more myself. | |
|
| |
Norfeest What's NXET?
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 48 Location : DMV
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 5:06 pm | |
| - The Homie, Acrid wrote:
- Going with Muggs...The longetivity of his career-his footprints bigger in Hip-Hop
| |
|
| |
TheHazardous Smells Like Roses...
Posts : 3500 Join date : 2009-05-28 Age : 43 Location : Bankhead SHAWTY and we'll take yo COOKIE!
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 6:56 pm | |
| Not only that, Muggs trained the Alchemist along with DJ Premier. He helped develop one of the best producers in the game. | |
|
| |
Laced With Slang Barack O-Donna
Posts : 9848 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 36 Location : Detroit
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm | |
| i think Muggs desrves it but im gonna vote Havoc because he was in both their primes i liked Havoc more | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Sun 04 Apr 2010, 10:08 pm | |
| - Slang Editorial wrote:
- i think Muggs desrves it but im gonna vote Havoc because he was in both their primes i liked Havoc more
What?^^ |
|
| |
Laced With Slang Barack O-Donna
Posts : 9848 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 36 Location : Detroit
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 12:22 am | |
| - N3R0N0N Of 0nslaught3r wrote:
- Slang Editorial wrote:
- i think Muggs desrves it but im gonna vote Havoc because he was in both their primes i liked Havoc more
What?^^ oops i meant to say when they were both in their primes respectively, i liked Havoc more lol | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 9:20 am | |
| Oh, lol. I can see that now. But when I first read that I was like...uh, what? |
|
| |
JulioRoddyMattyTonyG Go Hawks
Posts : 4016 Join date : 2009-09-24
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm | |
| Smh... everyone has basically said Muggs is better... but Havoc has two albums you guys really love. |
|
| |
JulioRoddyMattyTonyG Go Hawks
Posts : 4016 Join date : 2009-09-24
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm | |
| I don't love those albums. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 12:52 pm | |
| I voted Muggs, because he has more classics and is FAR AND AWAY more consistent. And diverse. Oh, and he's been around longer. OH, and his discography in any given time frame is longer and better. So yeah, just in every fucking category. Just better. Period. Those are FACTS. |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm | |
| Havoc and quite EASILY too....
Muggs is very dope and has done more than a few joints I enjoy but Havoc is just straight up ridiculous...dude's track record for incredible beats is matched by the elite only..i.e. Pete Rock, Premier, Marley Marl, Dr.Dre, RZA, etc..etc...
Havoc wins here comfortably.... | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 9:49 pm | |
| - Lionel Hutz wrote:
- Smh... everyone has basically said Muggs is better... but Havoc has two albums you guys really love.
7 people (myself included) voted for Havoc so you can't say everyone, and Havoc has 4 Mobb Deep albums I love, and a number of other albums and tracks I love as well. |
|
| |
TheHazardous Smells Like Roses...
Posts : 3500 Join date : 2009-05-28 Age : 43 Location : Bankhead SHAWTY and we'll take yo COOKIE!
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 10:52 pm | |
| Muggs' bulletpoints:
Trained Alchemist The Whole Cypress Hill Discog House of Pain First 2 Funkdoobiest Joints Vs. Series Soul Assassins And his sound is diverse
What more do you need? | |
|
| |
Norfeest What's NXET?
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 48 Location : DMV
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 11:04 pm | |
| - TheHazardous wrote:
- Muggs' bulletpoints:
Trained Alchemist The Whole Cypress Hill Discog House of Pain First 2 Funkdoobiest Joints Vs. Series Soul Assassins And his sound is diverse
What more do you need? To be from NY... Just kidding? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Mon 05 Apr 2010, 11:10 pm | |
| It's not just being from NY, though, because if this was Scram Jones, Necro, 4th Disciple, etc etc etc |
|
| |
ACRID" It Takes A Nation of 1000s?
Posts : 1251 Join date : 2009-05-08 Age : 39 Location : DC by way of So.Cal.
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 8:05 am | |
| - D.Powell wrote:
- Havoc and quite EASILY too....
Muggs is very dope and has done more than a few joints I enjoy but Havoc is just straight up ridiculous...dude's track record for incredible beats is matched by the elite only..i.e. Pete Rock, Premier, Marley Marl, Dr.Dre, RZA, etc..etc...
Havoc wins here comfortably.... Muggs can hang with any one 'em without a doubt.. Check Yo Self Remix + 3 tracks off Cube's Predator album Jump Around-easily in the top 15-20 Hip-Hop tracks of all time | |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 10:01 am | |
| - The Homie, Acrid wrote:
- D.Powell wrote:
- Havoc and quite EASILY too....
Muggs is very dope and has done more than a few joints I enjoy but Havoc is just straight up ridiculous...dude's track record for incredible beats is matched by the elite only..i.e. Pete Rock, Premier, Marley Marl, Dr.Dre, RZA, etc..etc...
Havoc wins here comfortably.... Muggs can hang with any one 'em without a doubt..
Check Yo Self Remix + 3 tracks off Cube's Predator album
Jump Around-easily in the top 15-20 Hip-Hop tracks of all time Nuff respect to Muggs and all that he has accomplished throughout his long career but IMO he can't not fuck with Pete Rock...Marley Marl.....Dr.Dre.....RZA...Premier...or Havoc...as well as Dilla or Da Bomb Squad to name a few...again IMO.....he is not on there levels even with "Jump Around"...shit the Pete Rock (remix) was better than the original IMO.....but Muggs is very dope..don't get it twisted...but he's not on those guys levels...because then I'm going to have to start naming every Pete Rock...or Marley Marl..or Premier..etc..etc..banger and that shit could take all damn day....lol | |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 10:10 am | |
| | |
|
| |
T. Myers One Of A Kind
Posts : 10879 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 42
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 10:42 am | |
| Powell, cats like Pete Rock, Dre, Premier, RZA, Marley are on another level. in Havoc's career, which has spanned over 15 years, he's only produced 2 classic albums, and he's not any more innovative than Muggs. Muggs has at least 2 classic albums, and IMO he has more than that. Not to mention the classic singles. I'm not seeing how Havoc wins easily. I can understand personal preference, but even with that Muggs' credentials speak for themself. Outside of The Infamous, Hell on Earth, and Murda Muzik, what has Havoc done that compares with the rest of Muggs' career? | |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm | |
| - T. Myers wrote:
- Powell, cats like Pete Rock, Dre, Premier, RZA, Marley are on another level. in Havoc's career, which has spanned over 15 years, he's only produced 2 classic albums, and he's not any more innovative than Muggs. Muggs has at least 2 classic albums, and IMO he has more than that. Not to mention the classic singles. I'm not seeing how Havoc wins easily. I can understand personal preference, but even with that Muggs' credentials speak for themself. Outside of The Infamous, Hell on Earth, and Murda Muzik, what has Havoc done that compares with the rest of Muggs' career?
Agreed Terry...those dudes are next level and I don't think Havoc is on their respective levels..but I do think personally he's better than Muggs...his beats on The Infamous alone puts him ahead of Muggs IN MY OPINION and when you add on the stuff he did on Hell On Earth and his beats used for Quiet Storm and Get Away well then he's surpassing Muggs by even more again IN MY OPINION...... | |
|
| |
Norfeest What's NXET?
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2009-05-07 Age : 48 Location : DMV
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 2:46 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm | |
| |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 4:55 pm | |
| - Kopasetick wrote:
- LOL
????? | |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 4:57 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Alan Smokes More Trees Than The Slash And Burn Technique
Posts : 5364 Join date : 2009-06-11 Age : 43 Location : Minneapolis, MN
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 7:11 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 9:20 pm | |
| He is out of place on the list Pounds...but IMO he's on that list because he's better than Muggs to me...that was the point..lol | |
|
| |
TheHazardous Smells Like Roses...
Posts : 3500 Join date : 2009-05-28 Age : 43 Location : Bankhead SHAWTY and we'll take yo COOKIE!
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 9:25 pm | |
| DP, have you peeped the VS. albums especially Grandmasters? | |
|
| |
Z-membu Hi, My Name Is!
Posts : 717 Join date : 2009-08-02 Age : 54 Location : Maputo, Mozambique
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 9:39 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
D.Powell NYC's Finest
Posts : 7631 Join date : 2009-05-11 Age : 104 Location : the back of a barn
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 9:51 pm | |
| - TheHazardous wrote:
- DP, have you peeped the VS. albums especially Grandmasters?
Oh yeah man...I own Grandmasters which is a very dope album...Muggs was shining on that one man... | |
|
| |
TheHazardous Smells Like Roses...
Posts : 3500 Join date : 2009-05-28 Age : 43 Location : Bankhead SHAWTY and we'll take yo COOKIE!
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm | |
| That is classic, it's the only album in GZA's discog I compare to Liquid Swords. | |
|
| |
T. Myers One Of A Kind
Posts : 10879 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 42
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Tue 06 Apr 2010, 10:37 pm | |
| - D.Powell wrote:
- TheHazardous wrote:
- DP, have you peeped the VS. albums especially Grandmasters?
Oh yeah man...I own Grandmasters which is a very dope album...Muggs was shining on that one man... The Production on Pain Language may be even better than Grandmasters. You should peep that if you haven't already. Planet Asia isn't on GZA's level, but the beats carry Planet Asia to classic levels IMO. | |
|
| |
Shaun I'm Ghetto Platinum
Posts : 10096 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 34 Location : Eardrum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quality
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Wed 07 Apr 2010, 1:18 am | |
| Yeah, Pain Language is straight fire. | |
|
| |
ACRID" It Takes A Nation of 1000s?
Posts : 1251 Join date : 2009-05-08 Age : 39 Location : DC by way of So.Cal.
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Wed 07 Apr 2010, 8:30 am | |
| - Shaun wrote:
- Yeah, Pain Language is straight fire.
I still havent even heard that album smh | |
|
| |
T. Myers One Of A Kind
Posts : 10879 Join date : 2009-05-06 Age : 42
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 Wed 07 Apr 2010, 8:34 am | |
| You should probably do that soon Acrid | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Who's Better? Part 4 | |
| |
|
| |
| Who's Better? Part 4 | |
|