Best Album 1999 Round 1: Chopper City vs. Hip Hop (B)

vs.

Not a fan of BG nor his albums. No vote.

bg

BG

BG

N/A

Is there anything that the Lone Catalysts album can be compared to? I mean, for a rough idea of how it sounds. I'm thinking it's something I might like.

like the BG a lot but havent heard the other

B Gizzle

It's got a Native Tongues vibe.

BG

No vote...I have never even seen the 2nd album cover in my life until 2 seconds ago

Bg but this is a perfect example of an album I think a lot of people would like but people sleep.

A Guest wrote:

Bg but this is a perfect example of an album I think a lot of people would like but people sleep.

Pretty fair though, since LC is the same way on the other end of the spectrum.

SyRuP Sippa wrote:

Feeling this... I'll have to check this album out...




No vote...

BG, fuck Pittsburgh

Who requested and cosigned Hip Hop being added?

Jeff, Pounds... Parker? I like the album, too, but not more than this BG

I was wondering. I add these obsure albums that people cosign in the pre list than none of them vote for it. I get its all about match ups but i'm just taking note for later yrs.

you pick the albums and ignore other ones people wanted in the tourney more... so it's all on you.

parker lewis wrote:

A Guest wrote:

Bg but this is a perfect example of an album I think a lot of people would like but people sleep.

Pretty fair though, since LC is the same way on the other end of the spectrum.

Yeah I wasn't being clear, I was referring to the LC.

Yeah Kev, that's a ridiculous statement. You don't fucking rank albums, then arbitrarily asign seeding then bitch when we vote against albums we want included. "Why'd you guys not vote for this 4.5 star album when I put it against a 5 star album?" This is why I dislike the way you do the seeding, but since you included shit I asked for I will participate. And no, Shaun, this isn't just like KJ who's bitching about his same sounding nonsense being put against each other in the first round. My complaint is about stacking niche albums that would have a chance if they weren't put against other shit that splits the votes they would get. If Vol 3 was put against I Am I wouldn't give a shit, but when "obscure albums" get put against each other it's ridiculous.

A Guest wrote:

Yeah Kev, that's a ridiculous statement. You don't fucking rank albums, then arbitrarily asign seeding then bitch when we vote against albums we want included. "Why'd you guys not vote for this 4.5 star album when I put it against a 5 star album?" This is why I dislike the way you do the seeding, but since you included shit I asked for I will participate. And no, Shaun, this isn't just like KJ who's bitching about his same sounding nonsense being put against each other in the first round. My complaint is about stacking niche albums that would have a chance if they weren't put against other shit that splits the votes they would get. If Vol 3 was put against I Am I wouldn't give a shit, but when "obscure albums" get put against each other it's ridiculous.

I don't have time for all of that seeding. Its not that serious to me on a internet forum of 8 regular posters. If we were running a bizness or to a bigger audience and we all got together and seriously planned it out that would be cool. Seeding is str8 bias anyway but more fair maybe. Random is not bias just not always fair. This is for entertainment and some good debates and ranting. And you want a tournament as predictable and boring as KJ wants it. You say you wouldn't care if I Am goes against Vol. 3 but KJ cares. He hates an obsure or album he deems unworthy moves on one of those don't. You just feel the opposite. My point is stop being selfish bitches. This is str8 survival of the fittest go for what you know or don't know. Since we have such a limited amount of posters most of your common "great" albums will always win. Like you, me, and Parker mentioned things are going to get real crazy in the 00's. Because most people only listened to what they are used too. And with only 8-9 true posters you cannot expect too much diversity.

I just find it funny I go through listening to all these obscure albums that get cosigned or brought up and then they get no votes. I really don't care that much I'm just observing. Plus most of you really are on my fuck u or semi dislike side and nothing I do will ever go over well with you and some others either way. I also purposely check threads to see the usual suspects who will have something to say about something I said and go the opposite just because its me saying it. I'm not upset about it or really concerned once again just an observation. KJ falls for it all the time i'm not that dude. I know people and their bullshit. Including my own bullshit.

Shaun wrote:

Jeff, Pounds... Parker? I like the album, too, but not more than this BG

I didn't vote because I don't know the BG and LoneCats aren't in my plans to finish. I can vote on everything I like if that's what you guys want, I thought I was doing it right.

After analyzing the album art, I think it's safe to say I wouldn't like the BG as much...

Parker this is one of the best songs on the cd that you'll hate:

Tic706 wrote:

A Guest wrote:

Yeah Kev, that's a ridiculous statement. You don't fucking rank albums, then arbitrarily asign seeding then bitch when we vote against albums we want included. "Why'd you guys not vote for this 4.5 star album when I put it against a 5 star album?" This is why I dislike the way you do the seeding, but since you included shit I asked for I will participate. And no, Shaun, this isn't just like KJ who's bitching about his same sounding nonsense being put against each other in the first round. My complaint is about stacking niche albums that would have a chance if they weren't put against other shit that splits the votes they would get. If Vol 3 was put against I Am I wouldn't give a shit, but when "obscure albums" get put against each other it's ridiculous.

I don't have time for all of that seeding. Its not that serious to me on a internet forum of 8 regular posters. If we were running a bizness or to a bigger audience and we all got together and seriously planned it out that would be cool. Seeding is str8 bias anyway but more fair maybe. Random is not bias just not always fair. This is for entertainment and some good debates and ranting. And you want a tournament as predictable and boring as KJ wants it. You say you wouldn't care if I Am goes against Vol. 3 but KJ cares. He hates an obsure or album he deems unworthy moves on one of those don't. You just feel the opposite. My point is stop being selfish bitches. This is str8 survival of the fittest go for what you know or don't know. Since we have such a limited amount of posters most of your common "great" albums will always win. Like you, me, and Parker mentioned things are going to get real crazy in the 00's. Because most people only listened to what they are used too. And with only 8-9 true posters you cannot expect too much diversity.

I just find it funny I go through listening to all these obscure albums that get cosigned or brought up and then they get no votes. I really don't care that much I'm just observing. Plus most of you really are on my fuck u or semi dislike side and nothing I do will ever go over well with you and some others either way. I also purposely check threads to see the usual suspects who will have something to say about something I said and go the opposite just because its me saying it. I'm not upset about it or really concerned once again just an observation. KJ falls for it all the time i'm not that dude. I know people and their bullshit. Including my own bullshit.

Touche, Kev. I'm done bitching. Honestly my frustration isn't even with the seeding, it's more with people being closed minded as fuck and I was really just blaming the seeding because if some one like Powell gave LC a chance he might actually like it but god forbid a cd not co-signed by Kool Herc himself touch his fuckin disc changer. I just miss Norf, GK3, Buggin, etc that kept the forum much more rounded instead of 2 sides arguing with each other constantly.

A Guest wrote:

Tic706 wrote:

A Guest wrote:

Yeah Kev, that's a ridiculous statement. You don't fucking rank albums, then arbitrarily asign seeding then bitch when we vote against albums we want included. "Why'd you guys not vote for this 4.5 star album when I put it against a 5 star album?" This is why I dislike the way you do the seeding, but since you included shit I asked for I will participate. And no, Shaun, this isn't just like KJ who's bitching about his same sounding nonsense being put against each other in the first round. My complaint is about stacking niche albums that would have a chance if they weren't put against other shit that splits the votes they would get. If Vol 3 was put against I Am I wouldn't give a shit, but when "obscure albums" get put against each other it's ridiculous.

I don't have time for all of that seeding. Its not that serious to me on a internet forum of 8 regular posters. If we were running a bizness or to a bigger audience and we all got together and seriously planned it out that would be cool. Seeding is str8 bias anyway but more fair maybe. Random is not bias just not always fair. This is for entertainment and some good debates and ranting. And you want a tournament as predictable and boring as KJ wants it. You say you wouldn't care if I Am goes against Vol. 3 but KJ cares. He hates an obsure or album he deems unworthy moves on one of those don't. You just feel the opposite. My point is stop being selfish bitches. This is str8 survival of the fittest go for what you know or don't know. Since we have such a limited amount of posters most of your common "great" albums will always win. Like you, me, and Parker mentioned things are going to get real crazy in the 00's. Because most people only listened to what they are used too. And with only 8-9 true posters you cannot expect too much diversity.

I just find it funny I go through listening to all these obscure albums that get cosigned or brought up and then they get no votes. I really don't care that much I'm just observing. Plus most of you really are on my fuck u or semi dislike side and nothing I do will ever go over well with you and some others either way. I also purposely check threads to see the usual suspects who will have something to say about something I said and go the opposite just because its me saying it. I'm not upset about it or really concerned once again just an observation. KJ falls for it all the time i'm not that dude. I know people and their bullshit. Including my own bullshit.

Touche, Kev. I'm done bitching. Honestly my frustration isn't even with the seeding, it's more with people being closed minded as fuck and I was really just blaming the seeding because if some one like Powell gave LC a chance he might actually like it but god forbid a cd not co-signed by Kool Herc himself touch his fuckin disc changer. I just miss Norf, GK3, Buggin, etc that kept the forum much more rounded instead of 2 sides arguing with each other constantly.

A Guest wrote:

Parker this is one of the best songs on the cd that you'll hate:

I did the right thing.

Powell I find it increasingly hard to believe you're over the age of 8.

lol

SyRuP Sippa wrote:

you pick the albums and ignore other ones people wanted in the tourney more... so it's all on you.

lol

Lone Catalysts by default and otherwise I'm sure. About a 4.25 star album IMO. J Rawls is a dope producer.